Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI

@tags:: #lit✍/📰️article/highlights
@links::
@ref:: Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI
@author:: book.cpj.fyi

=this.file.name

Book cover of "Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI"

Reference

Notes

Quote

Each of the attributes in the existing models are important, but othering. With a few exceptions (e.g. relationships/relating and leadership/leading), they’re about things. And those things are far from the work. It always seems to set up a dynamic where folks are heckling the organization en masse. Those people don't have the right skills. The strategy is wrong. This process is broken. I wanted a model that could be about things and activities, to create a new dynamic for OD that gets closer to the work. (Another side note: this is even worse with ideas like “People/Process/Tools,” which almost everyone understands to mean “We need new people, new process, and new tools.”)
- No location available
-


dg-publish: true
created: 2024-07-01
modified: 2024-07-01
title: Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI
source: hypothesis

@tags:: #lit✍/📰️article/highlights
@links::
@ref:: Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI
@author:: book.cpj.fyi

=this.file.name

Book cover of "Why Is It Needed? | CPJ.FYI"

Reference

Notes

Quote

Each of the attributes in the existing models are important, but othering. With a few exceptions (e.g. relationships/relating and leadership/leading), they’re about things. And those things are far from the work. It always seems to set up a dynamic where folks are heckling the organization en masse. Those people don't have the right skills. The strategy is wrong. This process is broken. I wanted a model that could be about things and activities, to create a new dynamic for OD that gets closer to the work. (Another side note: this is even worse with ideas like “People/Process/Tools,” which almost everyone understands to mean “We need new people, new process, and new tools.”)
- No location available
-